"Since it is in the best interest of the students that the citizens of the district become aware of the strengths and limitations of the school and suggested recommendations for improvement, the Commission requires that the evaluation report be made public in accordance with the Commission's Policy on Distribution, Use, and Scope of the Visiting Committee report."
COMMISSION ON PUBLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS
November 6, 2002
The Commission on Public Secondary Schools, at its September 22-23, 2002 meeting, reviewed the evaluation report from the recent visit to Billerica Memorial High School and voted to award the school continued accreditation in the New England Association of Schools and Colleges.
The Commission was impressed with many of the programs and services at Billerica Memorial High School and wishes to commend the following:
the wide dissemination of the mission statement and student expectations for learning
the efforts of administration, faculty, staff, and students to create a supportive culture that encourages both individual development and community spirit
the learning center that provides tutoring to students
the variety of learning opportunities beyond the school campus
the wide range of co-curricular activities
the hiring of six additional teachers
the mentoring program for new teachers
the curriculum focus groups which include teachers and district-wide coordinators and their role in examining existing curriculum and recommending revisions based on assessment results
the efforts by many teachers to personalize instruction
the training of the staff in the Skillful Teacher Program
the commitment to lower class sizes in levels two and three courses
the efforts of teachers to communicate progress to students, parents. and the public on student progress in meeting expectations for student learning
the use of formative assessments to gauge student progress towards course proficiencies and to guide future instruction
the initial efforts to use performance based activities to evaluate and adjust instruction
the positive learning environment
the commitment to quality education demonstrated by the administration and faculty
the celebration of student achievement
the positive contributions of all areas of student support services personnel in meeting the needs of students
the curriculum support given to all students and faculty members by the library media specialist
the support provided by the learning center
the introduction of the freshmen class to the teachers through parental letters
the wide variety of business and collegiate partnerships, including Cisco System's certification program
the development and implementation of the Conflict Resolution Program
All accredited schools must submit a required Two-Year Progress Report, which in the case of Billerica Memorial High School is due on October 1, 2004. In that report school officials should indicate the status of each recommendation in the school's evaluation report by classifying it in one of five categories: Completed, In Progress, Planned for the Future, Rejected or No Action. In addition, they should provide a brief description of the action that has been taken on each valid recommendation in the evaluation report and include anticipated dates of completion where applicable. Special care should be taken to include appropriate information to justify the Rejected or No Action status of any recommendation.
The Two-Year Progress Report should also provide detailed explanations regarding the manner in which each of the following highlighted recommendations has been addressed:
submit school-wide performance standards/rubrics, approved by the faculty, for each of the academic expectations in the mission
provide specific evidence of the use of the mission and expectations for student learning document to guide decision-making, particularly related to teaching and learning
confirm that there is a written curriculum for all courses which includes learning experiences in support of the academic expectations in the mission for which the department has assumed some responsibility
describe the school's process for determining the extent to which each student in the school has achieved the academic expectations in the mission based on the use of school-wide performance standards/rubrics
explain how the school ensures that instruction in all course levels supports the development of higher order thinking and problem- so lving skills
provide time and resources to support collegial discussion of instruction, student work, and assessment practices
develop and implement a process for providing professional development that is based on faculty input regarding identified needs
provide professional development on use of an increased variety of instructional practices
provide professional development in the use of rubrics
document an increase in the use of a variety of assessment strategies in all academic areas at all levels
develop and implement a plan to use the results of assessments to guide revisions in curriculum and instruction
cite specific examples of professional discourse which has focused on the school's current grouping practices, including research used
explain how a full-range of health services is provided when nursing personnel are used to substitute in other schools in the system
develop and implement a written procedure for the on-going maintenance of the building
implement the capital improvement plan as written
describe steps taken to resolve the heating and ventilation problems throughout the building
assess the adequacy of the daily cleanliness of the building
resolve students' concerns related to the conditions of student lavatories
The Commission congratulates the school administration and faculty for completing the first two phases of the accreditation program: the self-study and the evaluation visit. The next step will be the follow-up process during which the school will implement valid recommendations in t he evaluation report. The Commission's Follow-up Seminars should help you and your faculty develop a schedule for implementing valid recommendations. In addition, the Commission's Accreditation Handbook provides information on follow-up procedures.
The school's accreditation status will be reviewed when the Commission considers the Two-Year Progress Report. Consistent with the Commission's follow-up procedures, the Two-Year Progress Report should be signed by the principal and chair of the Follow-Up Committee and the Coriumsion office by certified mail, return receipt requested.
COMMISSION ON PUBLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS
REPORT OF THE VISITING COMMITTEE
Billerica Memorial High School
Billerica, Massachusetts
March 3, 4, 5, 6, 2002
STATEMENT ON LIMITATIONS
THE DISTRIBUTION, USE, AND SCOPE OF THE VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT
The Commission on Public Secondary Schools of the New England Association of Schools and Colleges considers this visiting committee report of Billerica Memorial High School to be a privileged document submitted by the Commission on Public Secondary Schools of the New England Association of Schools and Colleges to the principal of the school and by the principal to the state department of education. Distribution of the report within the school community is the responsibility of the school principal. The final visiting cominittee report must be released in its entirety within sixty (60) days of its completion to the superintendent, school board, public library or town office, and the appropriate news media.
The prime concern of the visiting committee has been to assess the quality of the educational program at Billerica Memorial High School in terms of the school's stated mission and the Commission's Standards for Accreditation. Neither the total report nor any of its subsections is to be considered an evaluation of any individual staff member but rather a professional appraisal of the school as it appeared to the visiting team.
INTRODUCTION
The New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC) is the oldest of the six regional accrediting agencies in the United States. Since its inception in 1885, the Association has awarded membership and accreditation to those educational institutions in the six-state New England region that seek affiliation.
The governing body of the Association is its Board of Trustees which supervises the work of five Commissions: the Commission on Institutions of Hgher Education (CH-1E), the Commission on Independent Schools (CIS), the Commission on Public Secondary Schools (CPSS), the Commissions on Technical and Career Institutions (CTCI) and the Commission on Public Elementary Schools (CPES).
As the responsible agency for matters of the evaluation and accreditation of public secondary school member institutions, CPSS requires visiting committees to assess the degree to which the evaluated schools meet the qualitative Standards for Accreditation of the Commission. Those standards are:
Teaching and Learning Standards Support Standards
Mission and Expectations for Student Learning
Curriculum
Instruction
Assessment of Student Learning
Leadership and Organization
School Resources for Learning
Community Resources for Learning
The accreditation program for public schools involves a threefold process: the self-study conducted by the local professional staff, the on-site evaluation conducted by the Commission's visiting committee, and the follow-up program carried out by the school to implement the findings of its own self-study and the valid recommendations of the visiting committee and those identified by the Commission in the Follow-Up process. Continued accreditation requires that the school be reevaluated at least once every ten years and that it show continued progress addressing identified needs.
Preparation for the Evaluation Visit - The School Self-Study
A steering committee of the professional staff was appointed to supervise the myriad details inherent in the school's self-study. At Billerica Memorial Mgh School, a committee of 6 members with the principal serving in an e-toffido capacity supervised all aspects of the selfstudy. The steering committee assigned all teachers and administrators in the school to appropriate subcommittees to determine the quality of all programs, activities, and facilities available for young people. In addition to faculty members, the self-study committee included one student and one parent.
The self-study of Billerica Memorial High School extended over a period of 17 school months from September 2000 to March 2002. The visiting committee was pleased to note that a student and a parent joined the professional staff in the self-study deliberations.
Public schools evaluated by the Commission on Public Secondary Schools must complete appropriate materials to assess their adherence to the Standards for Accreditation and the quality of their educational offerings in light of the school's mission, learning expectations, and unique student population. In addition to using the self-study Guides developed by a representative group of New England educators and approved by the Commission, Billerica Memorial High School also used questionnaires developed by the Office for Research and Education at the University of Maine to reflect the concepts contained in the Standards for Accreditation. These materials provided discussion items for a comprehensive assessment of the school by the professional staff during the self-study.
It is important that the reader understand that every subcommittee appointed by the steering committee was required to present its report to the entire professional staff for approval. No single report developed in the self-study became part of the official self-study documents until the entire professional staff had approved it.
The Visiting Committee
A visiting committee of sixteen evaluators was assigned by the Commission on Public Secondary Schools to evaluate the Billerica Memorial High School in light of the Commission's Standards for Accreditation. The committee members spent four days in Billerica Memorial High School, reviewed the self-study documents which had been prepared for their examination, and met with administrators, teachers, other school and system personnel, students, and parents to determine the degree to which the school meets the Commission's Standards for Accreditation. Since the evaluators represented different public school systems, diverse points of view were brought to bear on the evaluation of Billerica Memorial High School.
The visiting team built its professional judgment on evidence collected from the following sources:
review of the school's self-study materials
sixty hours shadowing sixteen students for a half day
a total of twenty hours of classroom observation (in addition to time shadowing students)
numerous informal observations in and around school
tours of the facility
individual meetings with thirty-two teachers about their work, instructional approaches, and the assessment of student learning
group meetings with students, parents, school and district administrators, and teachers
the examination of student work including a selection of work collected by the school
Each conclusion on the report was agreed to by team consensus. Sources of evidence for each conclusion drawn by the visiting committee appear in parenthesis in the Standards sections of the report. The seven Standards for Accreditation reports include commendations and recommendations that in the team's judgment will be helpful to the school as it works to improve teaching and learning and to better meet Commission Standards.
This report of the findings of the visiting committee will be forwarded to the Commission on Public Secondary Schools that will make a decision on the accreditation of Billerica Memorial High School.
Quality of the Self-Assessment
The self-assessment completed by the professional staff at Billerica Memorial High School had a consistent quality for each component of the standards. For all of the Standards of Accreditation, the information provided the committee with findings reflective of the strengths and needs of the school. Each indicator was addressed and rated and the staff provided the committee with a judgment of where more work was needed. As a result of this thorough presentation, the visiting committee was able to use the report not only to confirm the school reform work underway but also to guide the future works of the school in those areas where needs remain unmet.
Overview of Findings
Although the conclusions of the visiting committee on the school's adherence to the Commission's Standards for Accreditation appear in various sections of this report, the committee wishes to highlight some findings in the paragraphs that follow. These findings are not intended to be summary of the report.
Billerica Memorial High School enjoys a fine reputation in the community it serves. The school has many of the elements necessary to provide youngsters with an excellent education well into the twenty-first century. Administration, faculty, students, and parents have affirmed the positive regard for this school. The high school has a delightful student body, that openly expresses positive beliefs regarding the academic preparation provided to students as well as the safe environment provided by administration and staff The students are bright, intelligent, articulate, personable, and open in discussing their school.
Billerica Memorial High School has an experienced professional staff that is appreciated by the school board and students. Most students report that they believe there is a caring adult to whom they can turn in a time of need. There is also an expansive facility that supports a comprehensive academic program and one that should be able to handle the anticipated increase in student population during the next few years.
Mission & Expectations for Student Learning
The Billerica community has successfully created high expectations for students in academic, civic, and social areas. These expectations have been further delineated in the Bridge Document. Further course proficiencies provide both parents and students with a clear outline of course expectations. Considerable effort has been expended to make the mission and expectations for student learning document known throughout the community. The mission and expectations for student learning reflects the fundamental values and beliefs of the Billerica community.
To ensure that the mission and expectations for student learning becomes a living document, it is imperative that this community develop a process to regularly review it to ensure that it reflects the needs of a changing student population. It is also imperative that the mission and expectations document become the guiding force in all future decision-making. Finally, although, there is growing awareness among students, parents, and staff regarding this document, more needs to be done to make the mission and expectations known, valued, and lived at Billerica Memorial High School.
Curriculum
The curriculum of Billerica Memorial High School provides challenging and rigorous work for many students at a variety of levels. Students in advanced classes stated their belief in the high quality of their academic preparation. The success of Billerica graduates is further evidence of the confidence expressed by students in their preparation. However, there is concern regarding the level of challenge and rigor demanded of all students in all disciplines at all levels. It is imperative that all students are held to high expectations in all levels of work.
Curriculum integration has begun in the American Studies program. However, a plan must be developed and implemented that will create more opportunities for similarly integrated curriculum. The use of rubrics is common in some areas and becoming more prevalent in others. However, this has usually been the result of the initiative of individual teachers rather than a systemic plan of professional or curriculum development. The development and implementation of rubrics that specify the expected level of the quality of student performance in all tasks, for all students, in all disciplines, at all levels is imperative. To successfiilly complete this daunting task the opportunity must be provided for staff to meet to review and revise student work in a formal manner. It is also imperative that the professional development program for the district support this initiative.
Assistance is offered to students in a multitude of ways. Among them are the learning center, Title I services, peer tutoring, the night school, and the extended year program. A wide range of cocurricular and extra-curricular offerings are available for students in which students are actively engaged.
The MCAS has had significant influence upon the revision of curriculum, possibly to the exclusion of other important, local sources of data such as classroom and departmental assessment. It is important that a formal process be designed and implemented to incorporate the results of that local assessment to guide fuLEARW~6GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r W 0 3 2 . g i f LEARW~7GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r W 6 1 5 . g i f LEARW~8GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r 4W 6 2 2 . g i f LEARW~9GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r W 6 2 5 . g i f LEAR~41GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r W 6 2 9 . g i f LEAR~42GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r W 6 3 3 . g i f LEAR~43GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r 8W 6 3 7 . g i f LEAR~44GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r W 6 4 0 . g i f LEAR~45GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r yW 7 1 6 . g i f LEAR~46GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r YW 7 2 3 . g i f LEAR~47GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r W 7 2 7 . g i f LEAR~48GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r W 7 3 1 . g i f LEAR~49GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r W 7 3 5 . g i f LEAR~50GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r (W 7 3 9 . g i f LEAR~51GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r W 7 4 2 . g i f LEAR~52GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r W 8 1 1 . g i f LEAR~53GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r W 8 1 8 . g i f LEAR~54GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r W 8 2 2 . g i f LEAR~55GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r IW 8 2 6 . g i f LEAR~56GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r iW 8 3 0 . g i f LEAR~57GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r W 8 3 3 . g i f LEAR~58GIF NU_! sh! A c l e a r )W 8 3 7 . g i f LEAR~59GIF NU_! sh! A E B O X . tG I F BOX GIF i*&